DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2004 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeGMC
ArmadaModelYukon
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats9
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
305 HPPower304 HP
522 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank123 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
265/70 R18Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5570 mm
2002 mmWidth2002 mm
1913 mmHeight1923 mm
2340 KgWeight2400 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase3302 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2004 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…