DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2003 GMC Envoy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeGMC
ArmadaModelEnvoy
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5328 cc
305 HPPower290 HP
522 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank96 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4 Hydra-Matic
265/70 R18Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5271 mm
2002 mmWidth1897 mm
1913 mmHeight1917 mm
2340 KgWeight2393 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase3275 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2003 GMC Envoy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…