DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2004 Chevrolet SSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChevrolet
ArmadaModelSSR
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
8Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
185 km/hTop speed210 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5326 cc
305 HPPower300 HP
522 NmTorque449 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank95 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt
15,2 ltAverage consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R18Tyre size255/45 R19; 295/40 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength4862 mm
2002 mmWidth1996 mm
1913 mmHeight1631 mm
2340 KgWeight2159 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2004 Chevrolet SSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…