DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Nissan Altima vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
AltimaModelTriton
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
182 HPPower136 HP
245 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
CVT XtronicGears5
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4874 mmLength5280 mm
1829 mmWidth1815 mm
1468-1473 mmHeight1780 mm
1450 KgWeight1820 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Nissan Altima and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…