DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Altima vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJeep
AltimaModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
210 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
182 HPPower163 HP
244 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
1 CVTGears6
215/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4864 mmLength4448 mm
1828 mmWidth1812 mm
1471 mmHeight1718 mm
1409 KgWeight1680 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Altima and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…