DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Altima vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
AltimaModelXC90
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
235 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
177 HPPower210 HP
244 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,2 lt
—Average consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/55 R17Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4798 mm
1796 mmWidth1898 mm
1471 mmHeight1743 mm
—Weight2080 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Altima and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…