DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan Altima vs 1996 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
AltimaModelGalaxy
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed199 km/h
2388 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
150 HPPower174 HP
216 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4641 mm
1704 mmWidth1810 mm
1420 mmHeight1730 mm
1294 KgWeight1785 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan Altima and 1996 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…