DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Almera vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
AlmeraModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
114 HPPower113 HP
235 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4264 mmLength4508 mm
1758 mmWidth1752 mm
1608 mmHeight1432 mm
1480 KgWeight1255 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Almera and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…