DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Almera vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolkswagen
AlmeraModelSharan
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
185 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
114 HPPower110 HP
158 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4620 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1440 mmHeight1730 mm
1115 KgWeight1665 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Almera and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…