DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Nissan Almera vs 2013 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
AlmeraModelCombo
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
184 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
107 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/70 R14; 185/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4390 mm
1710 mmWidth1831 mm
1440 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1160 KgWeight—
2535 mmWheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Nissan Almera and 2013 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…