DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Almera vs 1999 Lada 2110 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLada
AlmeraModel2110
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
173 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1500 cc
90 HPPower92 HP
128 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/70 SR13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4440 mm
1695 mmWidth1676 mm
1445 mmHeight1425 mm
1105 KgWeight1100 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Almera and 1999 Lada 2110 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…