1996 • Nissan
Almera
Nissan Almera 1.4 (87 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
1996 Nissan Almera vs 2000 Holden Barina Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
Barina
Holden Barina 1.4 i 16V Swing (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Holden Barina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationHolden Barina
NissanMakeHolden
AlmeraModelBarina
1996Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationHolden Barina
12,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
172 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1392 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
87 HPPower90 HP
116 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationHolden Barina
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationHolden Barina
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R 13Tyre size165/70 R13 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationHolden Barina
4320 mmLength3741 mm
1690 mmWidth1608 mm
1395 mmHeight1420 mm
1070 KgWeight1420 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2443 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Nissan Almera and 2000 Holden Barina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…