DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Nissan Almera vs 2000 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
AlmeraModelAstra
1995Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
172 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1392 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
87 HPPower90 HP
116 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R 13Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4110 mm
1690 mmWidth1709 mm
1395 mmHeight1425 mm
1070 KgWeight1090 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Nissan Almera and 2000 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…