DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Nissan AD vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 80
NissanMakeAudi
ADModel80
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1974 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
76 HPPower90 HP
132 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 80
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 80
4175 mmLength4482 mm
1665 mmWidth1695 mm
1480 mmHeight1408 mm
—Weight1230 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Nissan AD and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…