DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Nissan AD vs 1990 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 100
NissanMakeAudi
ADModel100
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1974 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
76 HPPower90 HP
132 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 100
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi 100
4175 mmLength4793 mm
1665 mmWidth1814 mm
1480 mmHeight1421 mm
1070 KgWeight1160 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Nissan AD and 1990 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…