DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Citroen Berlingo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCitroen
ADModelBerlingo
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h12,4-13.4 s
180 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
124 HPPower99 HP
173 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank53 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/65 R15; 215/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4380 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1500 mmHeight1801-1862 mm
1140 KgWeight1374-1559 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Citroen Berlingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…