DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAlfa Romeo
ADModel147
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
163 NmTorque275 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R 15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength4170 mm
1695 mmWidth1729 mm
1475 mmHeight1439 mm
1130 KgWeight1345 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…