DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan AD vs 2005 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Combo
NissanMakeOpel
ADModelCombo
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Combo
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
149 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption6,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Combo
4370 mmLength4322 mm
1695 mmWidth1684 mm
1475 mmHeight1801 mm
1130 KgWeight1295 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan AD and 2005 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…