DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan AD vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
ADModelVectra
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
149 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength4596 mm
1695 mmWidth1798 mm
1475 mmHeight1460 mm
1130 KgWeight1503 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan AD and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…