DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan AD vs 2003 Mitsubishi Space Star Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Star

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
ADModelSpace Star
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
105 HPPower102 HP
149 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength4030 mm
1695 mmWidth1715 mm
1475 mmHeight1515 mm
1130 KgWeight1350 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan AD and 2003 Mitsubishi Space Star approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Star leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…