DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan AD vs 2003 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLancia
ADModelPhedra
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,4 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
105 HPPower107 HP
149 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength4750 mm
1695 mmWidth1863 mm
1475 mmHeight1760 mm
1130 KgWeight1736 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan AD and 2003 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…