DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
ADModelMegane
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
105 HPPower116 HP
149 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength4164 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1475 mmHeight1420 mm
1130 KgWeight1120 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…