DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Astra
NissanMakeOpel
ADModelAstra
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Astra
—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
105 HPPower101 HP
149 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Astra
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Astra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Astra
4370 mmLength4110 mm
1695 mmWidth1709 mm
1475 mmHeight1425 mm
1130 KgWeight1250 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…