DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
NissanMakeFord
ADModelFocus
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
105 HPPower115 HP
149 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
4370 mmLength4178 mm
1695 mmWidth1702 mm
1475 mmHeight1481 mm
1130 KgWeight1279 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…