DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Fiat Egea HB Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFiat
ADModelEgea HB
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
150 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—TransmissionAT
—Tyre size16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4368 mm
1695 mmWidth1792 mm
1500 mmHeight1495 mm
1250 KgWeight1300 kg
—Luggage capacity440 lt
2600 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan AD

No additional feature records are available.

Fiat Egea HBDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Fiat Egea HB approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…