DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan AD vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
NissanMakeCitroen
ADModelC3
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower112 HP
150 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
4395 mmLength3941 mm
1695 mmWidth1728 mm
1500 mmHeight1524 mm
1250 KgWeight1090 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan AD and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…