DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
ADModelLancer
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
150 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4585 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1500 mmHeight1515 mm
1250 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…