DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Nissan AD vs 2007 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Bravo
NissanMakeFiat
ADModelBravo
2007Model year2007
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Bravo
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
109 HPPower120 HP
150 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Bravo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Bravo
4395 mmLength4336 mm
1695 mmWidth1792 mm
1500 mmHeight1498 mm
1250 KgWeight1260 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Nissan AD and 2007 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…