DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan AD vs 2011 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMini
ADModelConvertible
2011Model year2011
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower112 HP
148 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption4,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3723 mm
1695 mmWidth1683 mm
1500 mmHeight1414 mm
—Weight1200 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan AD and 2011 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…