DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
NissanMakeVolvo
ADModelV50
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
148 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
4395 mmLength4514 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1500 mmHeight1452 mm
—Weight1340 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…