DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 3
NissanMakeMazda
ADModel3
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
148 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 3
4395 mmLength4460 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1500 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…