DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Hyundai Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHyundai
ADModelMatrix
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
109 HPPower102 HP
148 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/65R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4025 mm
1695 mmWidth1740 mm
1500 mmHeight1635 mm
—Weight1280 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Hyundai Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…