DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan AD vs 1998 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
NissanMakeFord
ADModelFocus
1996Model year1998
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
79 HPPower90 HP
103 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationFord Focus
4175 mmLength4362 mm
1665 mmWidth1698 mm
1480 mmHeight1430 mm
960 KgWeight1205 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan AD and 1998 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…