DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan AD vs 2004 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLancia
ADModelMusa
2003Model year2004
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1295 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
120 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R15

Dimensions

4370 mmLength3985 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1475 mmHeight1688 mm
1110 KgWeight1200 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan AD and 2004 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…