DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Fiat Panda Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Panda

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Panda
NissanMakeFiat
ADModelPanda
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Panda
—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
90 HPPower95 HP
121 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Panda
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Panda
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationFiat Panda
4395 mmLength3705 mm
1695 mmWidth1662 mm
1500 mmHeight1657 mm
—Weight1165 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Fiat Panda approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Panda leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…