DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan AD vs 2015 Opel Adam Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Adam
NissanMakeOpel
ADModelAdam
2015Model year2015
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Adam
—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1229 cc
90 HPPower70 HP
121 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Adam
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Adam
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationOpel Adam
4395 mmLength3698 mm
1695 mmWidth1720 mm
1500 mmHeight1484 mm
—Weight1026 kg
—Luggage capacity170 lt
2600 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan AD

No additional feature records are available.

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningAlloy WheelsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan AD and 2015 Opel Adam approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…