DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan AD vs 2015 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
ADModelMicra
2015Model year2015
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
121 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3825 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1500 mmHeight1510 mm
—Weight955 kg
—Luggage capacity265 lt
2600 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan AD

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan MicraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsSunroofUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan AD and 2015 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…