DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan AD vs 2015 Mitsubishi Space Star Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMitsubishi
ADModelSpace Star
2015Model year2015
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,8 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
90 HPPower80 HP
121 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
—TransmissionAutomatic
—Tyre size15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3795 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1500 mmHeight1505 mm
—Weight865 kg
—Luggage capacity175 lt
2600 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan AD

No additional feature records are available.

Mitsubishi Space StarDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan AD and 2015 Mitsubishi Space Star approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…