DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Nissan AD vs 2015 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSeat
ADModelToledo
2014Model year2015
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
121 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15; 215/45 R16; 215/40 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4482 mm
1695 mmWidth1706 mm
1500 mmHeight1461 mm
—Weight1156 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Nissan AD and 2015 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…