DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan 350Z vs 2009 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan 350Z

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
350ZModelTaurus
2009Model year2009
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,8 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
300 HPPower365 HP
361 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/45 R19
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4315 mmLength5154 mm
1815 mmWidth1935 mm
1325 mmHeight1542 mm
1545 KgWeight1981 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan 350Z and 2009 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan 350Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…