DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan 350Z vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan 350Z

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.

79.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
350ZModelClio
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
250 km/hTop speed235 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
283 HPPower255 HP
352 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption14,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R18; 245/45 R18Tyre size205/50 R17; 235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4310 mmLength3800 mm
1815 mmWidth1810 mm
1328 mmHeight1360 mm
1635 KgWeight1335 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan 350Z and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan 350Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…