DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1946 Moskvich 400 vs 2001 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 17 points.

51.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MoskvichMakeAlfa Romeo
400Model166
1946Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
90 km/hTop speed243 km/h
1070 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
23 HPPower226 HP
55 NmTorque275 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
31 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption18,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears6
130/80 R16Tyre size215/55 R16W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3855 mmLength4720 mm
1400 mmWidth1815 mm
1555 mmHeight1416 mm
885 KgWeight1510 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1946 Moskvich 400 and 2001 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 17 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

Comments are loading…