DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Moskvich 2141 vs 1996 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MoskvichMakeRover
2141ModelMini MK
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
150 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1478 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
72 HPPower63 HP
106 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank34 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/80 R14 STyre size145/70 R12 Q
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength3100 mm
1690 mmWidth1440 mm
1400 mmHeight1351 mm
1065 KgWeight700 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Moskvich 2141 and 1996 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…