DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Morgan 4/4 vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Morgan 4/4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo V50
MorganMakeVolvo
4/4ModelV50
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo V50
8,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
111 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque165 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo V50
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo V50
3890 mmLength4514 mm
1500 mmWidth1770 mm
1290 mmHeight1452 mm
868 KgWeight1305 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Morgan 4/4 and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Morgan 4/4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…