DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Morgan 4/4 vs 2007 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Morgan 4/4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo C30
MorganMakeVolvo
4/4ModelC30
2007Model year2007
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo C30
8,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
111 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque165 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo C30
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Morgan 4/4SpecificationVolvo C30
3890 mmLength4252 mm
1500 mmWidth1782 mm
1290 mmHeight1447 mm
868 KgWeight1279 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Morgan 4/4 and 2007 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Morgan 4/4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…