DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Morgan 4/4 vs 2006 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Morgan 4/4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Morgan 4/4SpecificationNissan AD
MorganMakeNissan
4/4ModelAD
2006Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Morgan 4/4SpecificationNissan AD
8,0 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
111 HPPower105 HP
160 NmTorque149 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Morgan 4/4SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Morgan 4/4SpecificationNissan AD
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Morgan 4/4SpecificationNissan AD
3890 mmLength4370 mm
1500 mmWidth1695 mm
1290 mmHeight1475 mm
868 KgWeight1130 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Morgan 4/4 and 2006 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Morgan 4/4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…