DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Morgan 4/4 vs 2009 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Morgan 4/4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MorganMakeFiat
4/4ModelBravo
2009Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
112 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque290 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4010 mmLength4336 mm
1720 mmWidth1792 mm
1220 mmHeight1498 mm
795 KgWeight1320 Kg
—Wheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Morgan 4/4 and 2009 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Morgan 4/4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…