DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2017 Fiat Fullback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Triton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
TritonModelFullback
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick Up
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
178 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—TransmissionAT
245/70 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength5285 mm
1815 mmWidth1785 mm
1780 mmHeight1775 mm
1835 KgWeight1875 kg
—Luggage capacity960 lt
3000 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Fiat FullbackDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Triton and 2017 Fiat Fullback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Triton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…