DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2017 Fiat Fullback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Fullback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
TritonModelFullback
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed169 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
178 HPPower154 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength5225 mm
1815 mmWidth1785 mm
1780 mmHeight1775 mm
1835 KgWeight1765 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Triton and 2017 Fiat Fullback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Fullback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…