DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2016 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
TritonModelL 200
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2442 cc
136 HPPower181 HP
324 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength5205 mm
1815 mmWidth1815 mm
1780 mmHeight1780 mm
1820 KgWeight1860 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Triton and 2016 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…